Richard Henderson wrote: > The reasons are the following: > > : > (2) C++ in 2.95 is already ABI incompatible with egcs 1.1 and gcc 3.0, > so clearly (to my mind anyway) it didn't matter whether we > shipped 2.95 or a snapshot, we would still be incompatible with > Red Hat 6 and Red Hat 8. > It seems that you are ignoring other major distros (Slackware, Suse, Debian, etc.) as well as commercial software. By providing an incompatible binary interface RedHat splits the Linux community into 2 parts. I am *very* concerned about this. I guess that RedHat (as the owner of Cygnus and working very closely with the FSF) would have had sufficient arguments to get an official(!) gcc 2.96 before release date of RedHat 7.0. Regards Harri - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Richard Henderson
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Harald Dunkel
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Jes Sorensen
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Michael Peddemors
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Marc Lehmann
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Alexander Viro
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Alan Cox
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Jesse Pollard
- Re: Standard Linux (Was What is up with Redhat 7.0?) Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Michael Meding
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Martin Dalecki