> I don't think I understand your point. Are you saying that gcc cannot be > expected to keep up with the ways in which the kernel uses it? My argument > is that providing a compiler that actually regresses (old version compiles > kernel, redhat 7.0 included one does not) is not a good choice. The bugs are as far as I can tell in the kernel sources not in gcc. The code optimising has improved and that gets us little suprises. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... David S. Miller
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... Cort Dougan
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... David S. Miller
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... Cort Dougan
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... Horst von Brand
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... yodaiken
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... Horst von Brand
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... yodaiken
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... Cort Dougan
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... Alan Cox
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... Horst von Brand
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new ad... David S. Miller
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new additio... Adrian Bunk
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new additio... Alan Cox
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new additio... Alexander Viro
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(te... David Woodhouse
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI Alan Cox
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9... Byron Stanoszek
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI ... Jakub Jelinek