On 2015/10/21 17:35, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:55:43AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> So I think the meaning of those error register is the same, but the way >> of handle it may different from SoCs, for single bit error: >> >> - SoC may trigger a interrupt; >> - SoC may just keep silent so we need to scan the registers using poll >> mechanism. >> >> For Double bit error: >> - SoC may also keep silent >> - Trigger a interrupt >> - Trigger a SEI (system error) >> >> Any suggestion to cover those cases? > Well, I guess we can implement all those and have them configurable > in the sense that a single driver loads, it has all functionality and > dependent on the vendor detection, it does only what the vendor wants > like trigger an interrupt or remain silent or ...
Hmm, so we need to keep the DT bindings for different SoCs which have different ways of handling the errors. Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
