From: Yaowei Bai <bywxiao...@163.com>

This patch makes report_latency return bool to improve readability,
indicating whether this new latency should be reported/recorded.

No functional change.

Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443537816-5788-2-git-send-email-bywxiao...@163.com

Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiao...@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c 
b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
index 4661442de07d..855c2c7612e8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
@@ -346,16 +346,16 @@ static void wakeup_print_header(struct seq_file *s)
 /*
  * Should this new latency be reported/recorded?
  */
-static int report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, cycle_t delta)
+static bool report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, cycle_t delta)
 {
        if (tracing_thresh) {
                if (delta < tracing_thresh)
-                       return 0;
+                       return false;
        } else {
                if (delta <= tr->max_latency)
-                       return 0;
+                       return false;
        }
-       return 1;
+       return true;
 }
 
 static void
-- 
2.6.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to