From: Yaowei Bai <bywxiao...@163.com> This patch makes report_latency return bool due to this particular function only using either one or zero as its return value.
No functional change. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443537816-5788-3-git-send-email-bywxiao...@163.com Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiao...@163.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> --- kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c index eaf5291bcf63..e4e56589ec1d 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c @@ -282,16 +282,16 @@ static void irqsoff_print_header(struct seq_file *s) /* * Should this new latency be reported/recorded? */ -static int report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, cycle_t delta) +static bool report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, cycle_t delta) { if (tracing_thresh) { if (delta < tracing_thresh) - return 0; + return false; } else { if (delta <= tr->max_latency) - return 0; + return false; } - return 1; + return true; } static void -- 2.6.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
