On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, LABBE Corentin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> of_match_device could return NULL, and so cause a NULL pointer
>> dereference later at line 132:
>> priv->flags = (uintptr_t) of_id->data;
>>
>> Reported-by: coverity (CID 1324141)
>
> This is a DT-only driver, hence this cannot happen?

Yeah I said the same in comment to some other patch in the
series. But it doesn't hurt much either. Coccinelle has no clue
about deeper semantics, just shallow semantics.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to