On Thursday 17 December 2015 10:54:47 Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > IIUC, we may have a problem with this. elf_hwcap is 64-bit long while
> > > elf_info[n] is 32-bit (Elf32_Addr), so we truncate AT_HWCAP if we ever
> > > go beyond bit 31. The above may need to look something like:
> > >
> > > #define COMPAT_ELF_HWCAP \
> > > (is_a32_compat_task() \
> > > ? compat_elf_hwcap \
> > > : (u32)elf_hwcap)
> > >
> > > #define COMPAT_ELF_HWCAP2 \
> > > (is_a32_compat_task() \
> > > ? compat_elf_hwcap2 \
> > > : (u32)(elf_hwcap >> 32))
> >
> > Yes, interesting find.
>
> BTW, we need to make sure this series (primarily the ABI) is big-endian
> safe. I know it is not targeted at this initially but given that the
> reason for doing it is legacy networking code, I wouldn't be surprised
> if someone asks for BE at some point in the future.
Yes, I'm sure that will be needed.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
