On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:27:40 +0100 (CET) > Tim Schmielau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in > > module.h recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous > > sched.h includes. > > Why are they "superfluous"? Because those compilation > units pick up sched.h indirectly, via other includes? > > If so, is that a thing we want to do?
No, there is nothing at all in these files that needs sched.h. I suppose the includes are left over from times when more unrelated macros lived in sched.h (fortunately much of that cruft got cleand up already). Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/