On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Al Viro wrote: > Uh-huh. How much of build coverage have you got with it?
Well, as said in the patch description, I compiled alpha, arm, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig, allmodconfig, and allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64. I also checked that no new warnings were introduced by the patch. > Note that "doesn't use symbols defined in sched.h" != "can remove > include of sched.h", which, in turn, is not the same as "removing it > doesn't cause problems on a couple of configs I've tried on amd64". Sure. But from my experience (I started posting these patches almost five years ago, inspired by a blog entry by davej) actually the only thing that prevents removing the sched.h include (other than using symbols defined there) is dereferencing current, which my scripts also check. Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
