Em Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:59:01PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:55:22PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> > 
> > The sa_flags field is not being initialized, so a garbage value is
> > being passed to sigaction.  Initialize it to zero.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c 
> > b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c
> > index 7bb0d13..7945462 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c
> > @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ static int __test__rdpmc(void)
> >  
> >     sigfillset(&sa.sa_mask);
> >     sa.sa_sigaction = segfault_handler;
> > +   sa.sa_flags = 0;
> 
> Would not something like:
> 
>       sa = (struct sigaction){
>               .sa_sigaction = segfault_handler,
>       };
>       sigfillset(&sa.sa_mask);
> 
> Be better?

I thought about that, but isn't that set in stone? This would be a 4
liner, while his is a one' :-)

- Arnaldo

Reply via email to