Em Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:21:27PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:03:50AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Would not something like:
> > >
> > > sa = (struct sigaction){
> > > .sa_sigaction = segfault_handler,
> > > };
> > > sigfillset(&sa.sa_mask);
> > >
> > > Be better?
> >
> > I thought about that, but isn't that set in stone? This would be a 4
> > liner, while his is a one' :-)
>
> Dunno, you're right that its rather unlikely struct sigaction is going
> to grow another member, but I like the above pattern better in general,
> makes it harder to end up with uninitalized bits.
>
> When performance matters the above pattern isn't ideal, but that should
> not be a concern here.
Right, I also always use :
struct foo bar = {
.baz = 1,
.name = "whatever",
};
Even more compact than using that cast. But didn't bother changing in
this case.
- Arnaldo
