On 03/03/2016 01:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2016 12:40:07 Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> +
>> + aliases {
>> + serial0 = &uart0;
>> + serial1 = &uart1;
>> + serial2 = &uart2;
>> + serial3 = &uart3;
>> + gpio0 = &gpio0;
>> + gpio1 = &gpio1;
>> + };
>>
> Please put the aliases in the per-board file and list only the
> devices that are actually connected (in case of uart)
Done.
>
>> + uart0: uart@200000 {
>
> Make this serial@200000, to follow the standard naming convention
Done.
>
>> +
>> + reset: reset-controller {
>> + compatible = "plxtech,nas782x-reset";
>> + #reset-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + stdclk: stdclk {
>> + compatible = "plxtech,ox810se-stdclk",
>> "plxtech,nas782x-stdclk";
>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>> + };
>
> Please change the compatible strings to have no 'x' wildcards in them, but
> instead use a specific model.
Ok, I switched to only oxsemi,ox810se-* strings.
>
> Regarding the vendor prefixes, my understanding is that "ox810se" was the name
> of the chip from Oxford Semiconductor, while nas7820 is a product name from
> PLX. I think it would be logical to use "oxford" as the vendor prefix
> for anything with a ox810se or ox820 ID in it rather than plxtech.
Ok, I switched to oxsemi but keeped plxtech and added oxsemi in the vendor
prefixes.
>
> Note that both of them are now historic, as PLX itself got bought by
> Avago and they seem to be discontinuing both the PLX and Oxfor brand
> names.
Yes, it's kind of a mess. The ox820 has been rebranded to plx7821, but not the
ox810...
>
> Arnd
>
Thanks,
Neil
