Andi Kleen wrote:
> de4x5 is stable, but tends to perform badly under load, mostly because
> it doesn't use rx_copybreak and overflows standard socket buffers with its
> always MTU sized skbuffs.
One of the reasons that de4x5 isn't gone already is that I get reports
that de4x5 performs better than the tulip driver for their card.
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik | Dinner is ready when
Building 1024 | the smoke alarm goes off.
MandrakeSoft | -/usr/games/fortune
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as ... kuznet
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... kuznet
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... kuznet
- tulip vs. de4x5 (was Re: Linux 2.4 S... Jim Schutt
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated... Bill Wendling
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... David C. Davies
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... David C. Davies
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test... David Ford

