> } Andi, neither you nor me nor Alan nor anyone are able to audit > } all this unnevessarily overcomplicated code. It was buggy, is buggy > } and will be buggy. It is inavoidable, as soon as you have hundreds > } of drivers. > } > If they are buggy and unsupported, why aren't they being expunged from > the main source tree and placed into a ``contrib'' directory or something > for people who may want those drivers? Because by 2.4.5 it will be working ;). Pain power 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... kuznet
- tulip vs. de4x5 (was Re: Linux 2.4 S... Jim Schutt
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated... Bill Wendling
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... David C. Davies
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... David C. Davies
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Up... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test... David Ford
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2... David Ford
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as ... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as ... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as ... David Ford
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2... tytso
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as ... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test... Jeff Garzik