* Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng...@intel.com> wrote: > This is Part 1 of previous 13 XSAVES patches. Break it down to > smaller series. There are no code changes; only minor fixes in > the titles. > > Fenghua Yu (3): > x86/fpu/xstate: Define and use fpu_user_xstate_size > x86/fpu/xstate: Rename xstate_size to fpu_kernel_xstate_size to > distinguish from fpu_user_xstate_size > x86/fpu/xstate: Keep init_fpstate.xsave.header.xfeatures as zero for > init optimization > > Yu-cheng Yu (1): > x86/fpu/xstate: Copy xstate registers directly to signal frame when > compacted format is in use > > arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h | 2 +- > arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 +- > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 7 +-- > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c | 21 +++++---- > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c | 32 ++++++++++---- > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 92 > +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 6 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
Hm, the series does not apply cleanly: patching file arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h patching file arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c Hunk #4 FAILED at 552. 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c which suggests that this series isn't against a recent x86 tree, right? Thanks, Ingo