On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:12:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > patching file arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h > patching file arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c > patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c > patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c > Hunk #4 FAILED at 552. > 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c > > which suggests that this series isn't against a recent x86 tree, right?
There are differences in tip/master and tip/x86/core. The main thing is using boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) or cpu_has_xsaves. My understanding is boot_cpu_has() is where we are going and basing on tip/master is easier for merging? Thanks, Yu-cheng
