* Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:12:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Hm, the series does not apply cleanly:
> >
> > patching file arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> > patching file arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> > patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
> > patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> > patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> > Hunk #4 FAILED at 552.
> > 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> >
> > which suggests that this series isn't against a recent x86 tree, right?
>
> That was based on the latest upstream kernel. I also keep a version based
> on tip/master. Would it work?
Yes, tip/master would be fine, or upstream bc231d9ede99 that has the x86 tree
already merged.
Thanks,
Ingo.
