From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>

There's no reason for gov_cancel_work() to exist at all, as it only
has one caller and the only thing done by that caller is to invoke
gov_cancel_work().

Accordingly, drop gov_cancel_work() and move its contents to the
caller.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |   19 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -336,17 +336,6 @@ static inline void gov_clear_update_util
        synchronize_sched();
 }
 
-static void gov_cancel_work(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
-       struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
-
-       gov_clear_update_util(policy_dbs->policy);
-       irq_work_sync(&policy_dbs->irq_work);
-       cancel_work_sync(&policy_dbs->work);
-       atomic_set(&policy_dbs->work_count, 0);
-       policy_dbs->work_in_progress = false;
-}
-
 static struct policy_dbs_info *alloc_policy_dbs_info(struct cpufreq_policy 
*policy,
                                                     struct dbs_governor *gov)
 {
@@ -544,7 +533,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_dbs_governor_s
 
 void cpufreq_dbs_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
-       gov_cancel_work(policy);
+       struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
+
+       gov_clear_update_util(policy_dbs->policy);
+       irq_work_sync(&policy_dbs->irq_work);
+       cancel_work_sync(&policy_dbs->work);
+       atomic_set(&policy_dbs->work_count, 0);
+       policy_dbs->work_in_progress = false;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_dbs_governor_stop);
 

Reply via email to