On 09-06-16, 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 09-06-16, 01:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > >> > >> There's no reason for gov_cancel_work() to exist at all, as it only > >> has one caller and the only thing done by that caller is to invoke > >> gov_cancel_work(). > >> > >> Accordingly, drop gov_cancel_work() and move its contents to the > >> caller. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 19 +++++++------------ > >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> > > Thanks! > > > I am wondering what happened to your other patches around the governor > > callbacks > > and why weren't they applied yet :) > > They are in linux-next now, aren't they?
Yeah, they are in now. -- viresh
