On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 09-06-16, 01:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> >> >> There's no reason for gov_cancel_work() to exist at all, as it only >> has one caller and the only thing done by that caller is to invoke >> gov_cancel_work(). >> >> Accordingly, drop gov_cancel_work() and move its contents to the >> caller. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 19 +++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
Thanks! > I am wondering what happened to your other patches around the governor > callbacks > and why weren't they applied yet :) They are in linux-next now, aren't they?
