In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:47:50 -0800), Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Now that most of the sizeof(array)/sizeof(array[0]) > conversions have been done (there are about 800 done > and about another 130 left), perhaps it could be > useful to change the code to use a define similar > to the list_for_each > > #define list_for_each(pos, head) \ > for (pos = (head)->next; prefetch(pos->next), pos != (head); \ > pos = pos->next) > > perhaps > > #define array_for_each(index, array) \ > for ((index) = 0; (index) < ARRAY_SIZE((array)); (index)++) I dislike this; it is overkill. list_for_each etc. are for list_head etc., of structures. On the other hand, arrays are not. It is very, very obvious how to access its members. --yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
