* Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:22:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > Once all your locking rework is assembled it might be good to have a
> > topic branch I could pull in. Both for testing and to handle conflicts
> > before it goes boom in the merge window ;-) Not necessary ofc, but I
> > think it'd be useful.
>
> Everything except the trylock_recursive is already in tip/locking/core.
>
> Ingo, is that all there is in that branch?
It has other bits as well - but I can create a separate topic branch for this,
which would be c7faee2109f9 plus trylock_recursive().
Could you send a final version of trylock_recursive() patch for me to apply?
Thanks,
Ingo
