On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Ted,
> 
> Am 01.01.2017 um 22:47 schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> That way we can get rid of the direct dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> >> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
> >> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org>
> >> Fixes: d475a507457b ("ubifs: Add skeleton for fscrypto")
> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>
> > 
> > Applied, thanks.
> 
> Just to make sure, this fixes a build error and should
> go into Linus' tree ASAP.

I didn't consider this a build error since it could be fixed via a
config change.  And it is a pretty big patch, even if it is mostly
moving (not that git recognized it as such)...

git show --stat -M 58ae74683ae2c07cd717a91799edb50231061938
commit 58ae74683ae2c07cd717a91799edb50231061938
Author: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>
Date:   Mon Dec 19 12:25:32 2016 +0100

    fscrypt: factor out bio specific functions
    
    That way we can get rid of the direct dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK.
    
    Fixes: d475a507457b ("ubifs: Add skeleton for fscrypto")
    Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
    Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
    Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebigg...@google.com>
    Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
    Reviewed-by: David Gstir <da...@sigma-star.at>
    Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>
    Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>

 fs/crypto/Kconfig           |   1 -
 fs/crypto/Makefile          |   1 +
 fs/crypto/bio.c             | 145 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/crypto/crypto.c          | 157 
+++++++++----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h |  16 ++++++++-
 include/linux/fscrypto.h    |  11 +++---
 6 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-)

                                                - Ted
                                                

Reply via email to