On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:28:36AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Ted, > > > > Am 01.01.2017 um 22:47 schrieb Theodore Ts'o: > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > >> That way we can get rid of the direct dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK. > > >> > > >> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > >> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> > > >> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> > > >> Fixes: d475a507457b ("ubifs: Add skeleton for fscrypto") > > >> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > Just to make sure, this fixes a build error and should > > go into Linus' tree ASAP. > > I didn't consider this a build error since it could be fixed via a > config change. And it is a pretty big patch, even if it is mostly > moving (not that git recognized it as such)... >
I thought you're supposed to be able to build the kernel no matter how it's configured. If this patch is really too large for 4.10 then perhaps we should make FS_ENCRYPTION select CONFIG_BLOCK instead? Eric