On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:14:14PM +0100, Robert Richter wrote: > On 17.01.17 19:16:56, Will Deacon wrote: > > I can't really see the trend given that, for system time, your > > pfn_valid_within results have a variance of ~9 and the early_pfn_valid > > results have a variance of ~92. Given that the variance seems to come > > about due to the reboots, I think we need more numbers to establish whether > > the data sets end up largely overlapping or if they really are disjoint. > > Assuming the numbers of both versions are not significant, please > apply one or the other.
I'd rather apply the pfn_valid_within version, but please can you Ack the patch first, since there was some confusion when it was posted about a translation fault that was never reproduced. Thanks, Will
