On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> wrote: > >> Note: Matching the driver to the I2C device requires another patch. >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg71914.html > > Do I get it right? With the patch applied we won't have a regression but > the new feature will only be available when the above series is > upstream? So, it is a "weak" dependency?
That is correct. This patch shouldn't cause any regressions, but isn't useful without the other patch series. The other patch series was picked up today by Rafael J. Wysocki. http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=148664872023023&w=2 Ben
