On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:35 PM, kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > [auto build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing] > [also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc7 next-20170209] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to > help improve the system]
Optimistic way of thinking: kbuild bot was fast enough. Pessimistic: it wasn't too slow enough. P.S. I think it against older version of the patch, thus, we may safely ignore this. > > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ben-Gardner/eeprom-at24-use-device_property_-functions-instead-of-of_get_property/20170210-025938 > config: x86_64-rhel (attached as .config) > compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901 > reproduce: > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make ARCH=x86_64 > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c: In function 'at24_get_pdata': >>> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c:580:7: error: 'chip' is a pointer; did you mean >>> to use '->'? > chip.page_size = 1; > ^ > -> > > vim +580 drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c > > 574 } else { > 575 /* > 576 * This is slow, but we can't know all eeproms, so we > better > 577 * play safe. Specifying custom eeprom-types via > platform_data > 578 * is recommended anyhow. > 579 */ > > 580 chip.page_size = 1; > 581 } > 582 } > 583 > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
