On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 09:48:40AM -0700, Doug Berger wrote: > On 03/24/2017 08:16 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 07:46:26AM -0700, Doug Berger wrote:
> If you would consider an alternative implementation where we scrap > the SError handler (i.e. maintain the ugliness in our downstream > kernel) in favor of a more gentle user mode crash on SError that > allows the kernel the opportunity to service the interrupt for > diagnostic purposes I could try to repackage that. If this is just for diagnostic purposes, I believe you can register a panic notifier, which can then read from the bus. The panic will occur, but you'll have the opportunity to log some information to dmesg. Thanks, Mark.
