On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:41:03PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:40:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Why is this the only anatop regulator which can have this problem and > > how do we know this is a good value? > Anatop regulator has no separate gate bit. > e.g. > 00000 Power gated off > 00001 Target core voltage = 0.725V > ... > So it may have no valid default voltage in case it's disabled in > bootloader. > e.g. regulator_enable() may not work. That doesn't answer my question. What I'm asking is why another anatop regulator might not end up disabled like this one. > The default voltage 1.100v this patch sets is defined in reference > manual. For the SoC you're currently looking at... might another have a different value?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
