Hi Heiko,
On 2017/6/15 23:10, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Hi Frank,
Am Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017, 15:23:16 CEST schrieb Frank Wang:
From: Finley Xiao <finley.x...@rock-chips.com>
Add a efuse node in the device tree for the rk3228 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.x...@rock-chips.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
index c2a78f4..dad195e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
@@ -314,6 +314,23 @@
status = "disabled";
};
+ efuse: efuse@11040000 {
+ compatible = "rockchip,rk322x-efuse";
was this binding included already? Simply because compatibles should
not contain placeholders, so rockchip,rk3228-efuse please - same for
the driver side.
Actually, I always remember it should be without placeholders from the
first time you commented :-)
but I saw that the binding and driver (rockchip,rk322x-efuse) have
already been applied, so I send this one keep the same with driver side.
Shall I resend a new patch to correct both of them to
'rockchip,rk3228-efuse' ?
BR.
Frank
Heiko
+ reg = <0x11040000 0x20>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ clocks = <&cru PCLK_EFUSE_256>;
+ clock-names = "pclk_efuse";
+
+ /* Data cells */
+ efuse_id: id@7 {
+ reg = <0x7 0x10>;
+ };
+ cpu_leakage: cpu_leakage@17 {
+ reg = <0x17 0x1>;
+ };
+ };
+
i2c0: i2c@11050000 {
compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-i2c";
reg = <0x11050000 0x1000>;
