Am Freitag, 16. Juni 2017, 17:24:23 CEST schrieb Frank Wang:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On 2017/6/15 23:10, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017, 15:23:16 CEST schrieb Frank Wang:
> >> From: Finley Xiao <finley.x...@rock-chips.com>
> >>
> >> Add a efuse node in the device tree for the rk3228 SoC.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.x...@rock-chips.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> >> index c2a78f4..dad195e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> >> @@ -314,6 +314,23 @@
> >>
> >> status = "disabled";
> >>
> >> };
> >>
> >> + efuse: efuse@11040000 {
> >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk322x-efuse";
> >
> > was this binding included already? Simply because compatibles should
> > not contain placeholders, so rockchip,rk3228-efuse please - same for
> > the driver side.
>
> Actually, I always remember it should be without placeholders from the
> first time you commented :-)
> but I saw that the binding and driver (rockchip,rk322x-efuse) have
> already been applied, so I send this one keep the same with driver side.
> Shall I resend a new patch to correct both of them to
> 'rockchip,rk3228-efuse' ?
Yes please :-) .
As it was probably applied for 4.13, changing the compatible shouldn't be
a problem.
Thanks
Heiko
>
>
> BR.
> Frank
>
> > Heiko
> >
> >> + reg = <0x11040000 0x20>;
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <1>;
> >> + clocks = <&cru PCLK_EFUSE_256>;
> >> + clock-names = "pclk_efuse";
> >> +
> >> + /* Data cells */
> >> + efuse_id: id@7 {
> >> + reg = <0x7 0x10>;
> >> + };
> >> + cpu_leakage: cpu_leakage@17 {
> >> + reg = <0x17 0x1>;
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> +
> >>
> >> i2c0: i2c@11050000 {
> >>
> >> compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-i2c";
> >> reg = <0x11050000 0x1000>;
