Hi Jon,
Quoting Jon Hunter <jonath...@nvidia.com>:
On 30/06/17 08:22, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Print and propagate the return value of platform_get_irq on failure.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
index 214fff9..ae71215 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
@@ -688,9 +688,9 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
}
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (irq <= 0) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ\n");
- return -ENODEV;
+ if (irq < 0) {
The changelog does not describe the above change and if/why this is ok.
However, the original test looks fine to me and so I don't see a need to
change this.
You are right about the changelog. I think this one is much better:
platform_get_irq() returns an error code, but the tegra-devfreq
driver ignores it and always returns -ENODEV. This is not correct,
and prevents -EPROBE_DEFER from being propagated properly.
Notice that platform_get_irq() no longer returns 0 on error:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=e330b9a6bb35dc7097a4f02cb1ae7b6f96df92af
Print error message and propagate the return value of
platform_get_irq on failure.
What do you think?
Thank you!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva
