On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 15:07:09 -0700 Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It is rather long. Although I actually hate the SUGOV, it is easily > > grepable. Just comment what it stands for. We can always change it > > later. > > I was thinking why not just SCHED_FLAG_CPUFREQ. That says its for > cpufreq purposes, and is a bit self-documenting. "WORKER" is a bit > redundant and can be dropped in my opinion. I was thinking that too, but was wondering how tightly coupled is this with SCHED_DEADLINE? I like the searchability of SUGOV, where as CPUFREQ is still quite broad. -- Steve
