On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 12:52:53PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 9:39:03 AM CEST Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Sep 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 12:52:09 PM CEST Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > In any case, I wouldn't mind it if you took the [3/3] from this 
> > > > > > series, because
> > > > > > if there are any conflicts with it, they will be trivial to 
> > > > > > resolve.  And I
> > > > > > don't need an immutable branch with it or anything like that.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No problem.
> > > > 
> > > > Although you don't appear to have reviewed it?
> > > 
> > > I have reviewed it, although I haven't sent a tag.
> > > 
> > > Generally speaking, for drivers/acpi/pmic/ Reviewed-bys from Mika and 
> > > Andy are
> > > sufficient (they likely are more familiar with the code in there than I 
> > > am),
> > 
> > I don't see them in MAINTAINERS.  I thought it was Len and yourself.
> 
> I do need help with code review at least in some areas, though.
> 
> Some of this information is missing from MAINTAINERS, but I guess that can be
> addressed in this particular case.
> 
> Mika, Andy, would it be OK to add you as reviewers for drivers/acpi/pmic/
> to MAINTAINERS?

Sure, fine by me. Andy is on vacation currently so can't speak for him.
I suppose he does not have anything against it, though :)

Reply via email to