On Thursday, September 7, 2017 1:07:26 PM CEST Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 12:52:53PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, September 7, 2017 9:39:03 AM CEST Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 07 Sep 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 12:52:09 PM CEST Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > In any case, I wouldn't mind it if you took the [3/3] from this > > > > > > > series, because > > > > > > > if there are any conflicts with it, they will be trivial to > > > > > > > resolve. And I > > > > > > > don't need an immutable branch with it or anything like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > No problem. > > > > > > > > > > Although you don't appear to have reviewed it? > > > > > > > > I have reviewed it, although I haven't sent a tag. > > > > > > > > Generally speaking, for drivers/acpi/pmic/ Reviewed-bys from Mika and > > > > Andy are > > > > sufficient (they likely are more familiar with the code in there than I > > > > am), > > > > > > I don't see them in MAINTAINERS. I thought it was Len and yourself. > > > > I do need help with code review at least in some areas, though. > > > > Some of this information is missing from MAINTAINERS, but I guess that can > > be > > addressed in this particular case. > > > > Mika, Andy, would it be OK to add you as reviewers for drivers/acpi/pmic/ > > to MAINTAINERS? > > Sure, fine by me. Andy is on vacation currently so can't speak for him. > I suppose he does not have anything against it, though :)
OK, thanks!
