On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> What about not enforcing any muxing state when we want to mux to the > "ldo" function? We just leave it to whatever value it is, that way we > keep it under the regulator framework's control, and we don't disrupt > anything when the pin is requested. In a way since setting the bits one way means "LDO on" and another setting means "LDO off" those bits should be handled by the regulator framework when used as a regulator, not pin control. So I would say yes. Yours, Linus Walleij
