On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Maxime Ripard > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What about not enforcing any muxing state when we want to mux to the >> "ldo" function? We just leave it to whatever value it is, that way we >> keep it under the regulator framework's control, and we don't disrupt >> anything when the pin is requested. > > In a way since setting the bits one way means "LDO on" and another > setting means "LDO off" those bits should be handled by the > regulator framework when used as a regulator, not pin control. > > So I would say yes.
I agree. That would be the best solution. ChenYu
