On Monday, October 16, 2017 8:00:45 AM CEST Li, Aubrey wrote: > On 2017/10/14 8:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, September 30, 2017 9:20:32 AM CEST Aubrey Li wrote: > >> Add a knob to make fast idle threshold tunable > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey...@linux.intel.com> > > > > I first of all am not sure about the need to add a tunable for this at all > > in the first place. > > Actually I think a fixed value(10) might be good enough but not quite sure > if there is a requirement to tune it for different scenario, for example even > if the predicted idle interval is 100x overhead, I still want a fast path for > a better benchmark score?
Any new tunables make the test matrix expand considerably, so it generally is better to err on the conservative side with adding them. Thanks, Rafael
