On 2017/10/17 8:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, October 16, 2017 8:00:45 AM CEST Li, Aubrey wrote: >> On 2017/10/14 8:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Saturday, September 30, 2017 9:20:32 AM CEST Aubrey Li wrote: >>>> Add a knob to make fast idle threshold tunable >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <[email protected]> >>> >>> I first of all am not sure about the need to add a tunable for this at all >>> in the first place. >> >> Actually I think a fixed value(10) might be good enough but not quite sure >> if there is a requirement to tune it for different scenario, for example even >> if the predicted idle interval is 100x overhead, I still want a fast path for >> a better benchmark score? > > Any new tunables make the test matrix expand considerably, so it generally is > better to err on the conservative side with adding them. >
Okay, it's fine for me without it. I'll remove in the next version. Thanks, -Aubrey
