On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 06:23:42PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
> 
> By itself, this is useless.  It gives us the ability to run some final
> code before exit that cannnot run on the kernel stack.  This could
> include a CR3 switch a la KAISER or some kernel stack erasing, for
> example.  (Or even weird things like *changing* which kernel stack
> gets used as an ASLR-strengthening mechanism.)
> 
> The SYSRET32 path is not covered yet.  It could be in the future or
> we could just ignore it and force the slow path if needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> Link: 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/d350017000eed20922c3b2711a2d9229dc809256.1511497875.git.l...@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 55 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Nice commenting, future generations will appreciate it!

:-)

Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Reply via email to