On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Vadim Lomovtsev <vadim.lomovt...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:52:21PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote: >> Another way to look at this is that the kernel should not be calling ACPI >> interfaces if ACPI is disabled. > > Yes, I agree. So in this case the ltp_acpi test case has to be updated with > such checking > before calling ACPI interfaces. However, it seems that such calls was put > there intentionally, > without ACPI state check, as part of kernel testing strategy.
Not really. Thanks, Rafael
