On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:48:49PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Vadim Lomovtsev > <vadim.lomovt...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:52:21PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote: > >> Another way to look at this is that the kernel should not be calling ACPI > >> interfaces if ACPI is disabled. > > > > Yes, I agree. So in this case the ltp_acpi test case has to be updated with > > such checking > > before calling ACPI interfaces. However, it seems that such calls was put > > there intentionally, > > without ACPI state check, as part of kernel testing strategy. > > Not really.
Ok, see your point. Thank you for your time. WBR, Vadim > > Thanks, > Rafael
