On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:08:45PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> +static inline void util_est_dequeue(struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> +{
> +     struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &task_rq(p)->cfs;
> +     unsigned long util_last = task_util(p);
> +     bool sleep = flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP;
> +     unsigned long ewma;
> +     long util_est = 0;
> +
> +     if (!sched_feat(UTIL_EST))
> +             return;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Update root cfs_rq's estimated utilization
> +      *
> +      * If *p is the last task then the root cfs_rq's estimated utilization
> +      * of a CPU is 0 by definition.
> +      */
> +     if (cfs_rq->nr_running) {
> +             util_est  = READ_ONCE(cfs_rq->util_est_runnable);
> +             util_est -= min_t(long, util_est, task_util_est(p));
> +     }
> +     WRITE_ONCE(cfs_rq->util_est_runnable, util_est);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Skip update of task's estimated utilization when the task has not
> +      * yet completed an activation, e.g. being migrated.
> +      */
> +     if (!sleep)
> +             return;
> +

Since you only use sleep once, you might as well write it out there.

Also, does GCC lower the task_util() eval to here?

> +        /*
> +         * Skip update of task's estimated utilization when its EWMA is 
> already
> +         * ~1% close to its last activation value.
> +         */
> +        util_est = p->util_est.ewma;
> +        if (abs(util_est - util_last) <= (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / 100))
> +                return;

Aside from that being whitespace challenged, did you also try:

        if ((unsigned)((util_est - util_last) + LIM - 1) < (2 * LIM - 1))

Also, since we only care about the absolute value; we could use:

        util_last - ewma

here (note the above also forgets to use READ_ONCE), and reuse the result:

> +
> +     /*
> +      * Update Task's estimated utilization
> +      *
> +      * When *p completes an activation we can consolidate another sample
> +      * about the task size. This is done by storing the last PELT value
> +      * for this task and using this value to load another sample in the
> +      * exponential weighted moving average:
> +      *
> +      *      ewma(t) = w *  task_util(p) + (1 - w) ewma(t-1)
> +      *              = w *  task_util(p) + ewma(t-1) - w * ewma(t-1)
> +      *              = w * (task_util(p) + ewma(t-1) / w - ewma(t-1))
> +      *
> +      * Where 'w' is the weight of new samples, which is configured to be
> +      * 0.25, thus making w=1/4
> +      */
> +     p->se.avg.util_est.last = util_last;
> +     ewma = READ_ONCE(p->se.avg.util_est.ewma);
> +     ewma   = util_last + (ewma << UTIL_EST_WEIGHT_SHIFT) - ewma;

here.

> +     ewma >>= UTIL_EST_WEIGHT_SHIFT;
> +     WRITE_ONCE(p->se.avg.util_est.ewma, ewma);
> +}


So something along these lines:

        ewma = READ_ONCE(p->se.avg.util_est.ewma);
        diff = util_last - ewma;
        if ((unsigned)(diff + LIM - 1) < (2 * LIM - 1))
                return;

        p->se.avg.util_est.last = util_last;
        ewma = (diff + (ewma << EWMA_SHIFT)) >> EWMA_SHIFT;
        WRITE_ONCE(p->se.avg.util_est.ewma, ewma);

Make sense?

Reply via email to