On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:29:59 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> wrote:
> Hi Richard, > > 2018-06-14 16:25 GMT+09:00 Richard Weinberger <rich...@sigma-star.at>: > > Masahiro, > > > > Am Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2018, 07:11:04 CEST schrieb Masahiro Yamada: > >> > >> The ->setup_data_interface() hook needs to know the clock frequency. > >> In fact, this IP needs three clocks, bus "which clock?" is really > >> confusing. (It is not described in the DT-binding at all.) > >> > >> This series adds more clocks. In the new binding, three clocks > >> are required: core clock, bus interface clock, ECC engine clock. > >> > >> This series also takes care of the backward compatibility by > >> providing hardcoded values in case the new clocks are missing. > >> So, existing DT should work. > >> > >> > >> Changes in v2: > >> - Split patches into sensible chunks > >> > >> Masahiro Yamada (3): > >> mtd: rawnand: denali_dt: use dev as a shorthand of &pdev->dev > >> mtd: rawnand: denali_dt: add more clocks based on IP datasheet > >> mtd: rawnand: denali: optimize timing parameters for data interface > > > > This still means that we need to feed at least 2/3 and 3/3 into -stable to > > unbreak the driver. > > > 3/3 is not mandatory. > > You can only back-port 1/3 and 2/3. Well, patch 1 is not a fix, can we move it after patch 2 so that only patch 2 is flagged with the Fixes+Cc-stable tags? Thanks, Boris
