On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 09:21:21PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > I don't think so, that patch has an issue with INTERRUPTIBLE, but IDLE > > very much doesn't allow signals like INTERRUPTIBLE does. > > I don't think I can provide a good commit log for > s/TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE/TASK_IDLE/ in kernel/kthread.c:kthread(). But I > can confirm that this patch makes the warning go away, so if you want to > address this, you can add my Tested-by:.
Yeah, it's also a little bit more involved, I'd also have to change all the kthread_bind() code and audit all kthread users to see if anybody else actually relies on TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. So I think I'll leave it as is for now, maybe another day ... :-)