On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:43:52 -0500 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:11:52PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > [ Note this is applied on top of the other patch to quiet gcc ] > > > > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rost...@goodmis.org> > > > > The function enable_trace_kprobe() performs slightly differently if the file > > parameter is passed in as NULL on non-NULL. Instead of checking file twice, > > move the code between the two tests into a static inline helper function to > > make the code easier to follow. > > > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180725224728.7b1d5...@vmware.local.home > > > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org> > > The enable_probe() name is a bit confusing, since it's not clear what > the difference is between enable_probe() and enable_trace_kprobe() > without looking at the code. Yeah, I didn't like that name either. > > Maybe call it __enable_trace_kprobe()? Hmm, that may work. > > Otherwise it's a definite improvement. > > Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> > Thanks, -- Steve
