> Technical merits and voter intent aside, this behavior is misleading and > inconsistent with previous kernels. Tools like top or a CPU dock applet show the goal of kernel revision is *not* to remain consistent with old stuff. > a constantly loaded CPU. Hacking them to deduct the load from 'kapm-idled' > seems like the wrong answer. so don't run APM already. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- kapm-idled : is this a bug? stewart
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Robert M. Love
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Rik van Riel
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Nick Holloway
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? stewart
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Mark Hahn
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Richard B. Johnson
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Kurt Garloff
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Pavel Machek
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Jamie Lokier
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bu... Pavel Machek
- Re: kapm-idled : is this ... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: kapm-idled : is this ... Pavel Machek
- Re: kapm-idled : is this ... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: kapm-idled : is this ... Pavel Machek