Hi!
> Technical merits and voter intent aside, this behavior is misleading and
> inconsistent with previous kernels. Tools like top or a CPU dock applet show
> a constantly loaded CPU. Hacking them to deduct the load from 'kapm-idled'
> seems like the wrong answer.
I guess we should just put even normal idle thread to be visible in
ps. It is cleaner design, anyway.
Pavel
--
I'm [EMAIL PROTECTED] "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- kapm-idled : is this a bug? stewart
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Robert M. Love
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Rik van Riel
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Nick Holloway
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? stewart
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Mark Hahn
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Richard B. Johnson
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Kurt Garloff
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Pavel Machek
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Jamie Lokier
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: kapm-idled : is this a bu... Pavel Machek
- Re: kapm-idled : is this ... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: kapm-idled : is this ... Pavel Machek
- Re: kapm-idled : is this ... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: kapm-idled : is this ... Pavel Machek
- Re: kapm-idled : is this ... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: kapm-idled : is this ... Igmar Palsenberg

