> On 2/24/19 7:17 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>>> @@ -2423,7 +2423,14 @@ static ssize_t __nr_hugepages_store_common(bool 
>>>> obey_mempolicy,
>>>>             * per node hstate attribute: adjust count to global,
>>>>             * but restrict alloc/free to the specified node.
>>>>             */
>>>> +          unsigned long old_count = count;
>>>>            count += h->nr_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid];
>>>> +          /*
>>>> +           * If user specified count causes overflow, set to
>>>> +           * largest possible value.
>>>> +           */
>>>> +          if (count < old_count)
>>>> +                  count = ULONG_MAX;
>>>>            init_nodemask_of_node(nodes_allowed, nid);
>>>>    } else
>>>>            nodes_allowed = &node_states[N_MEMORY];
>>>>
>>
>> Looks like this fixes the overflow issue, but isn't there already a 
>> possible underflow since we don't hold hugetlb_lock?  Even if 
>> count == 0, what prevents h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid] being greater than 
>> h->nr_huge_pages here?  I think the per hstate values need to be read with 
>> READ_ONCE() and stored on the stack to do any sane bounds checking.
> 
> Yes, without holding the lock there is the potential for issues.  Looking
> back to when the node specific code was added there is a comment about
> "re-use/share as much of the existing global hstate attribute initialization
> and handling".  I suspect that is the reason for these calculations outside
> the lock.
> 
> As you mention above, nr_huge_pages_node[nid] could be greater than
> nr_huge_pages.  This is true even if we do READ_ONCE().  So, the code would
> need to test for this condition and 'fix up' values or re-read.  It is just
> racy without holding the lock.
> 
> If that is too ugly, then we could just add code for the node specific
> adjustments.  set_max_huge_pages() is only called from here.  It would be
> pretty easy to modify set_max_huge_pages() to take the node specific value
> and do calculations/adjustments under the lock.

Ok, what about just moving the calculation/check inside the lock as in the
untested patch below?

Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.krav...@oracle.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 1c5219193b9e..5afa77dc7bc8 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ static int adjust_pool_surplus(struct hstate *h,
nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
 }

 #define persistent_huge_pages(h) (h->nr_huge_pages - h->surplus_huge_pages)
-static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
+static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
                                                nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
 {
        unsigned long min_count, ret;
@@ -2289,6 +2289,23 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned
long count,
                goto decrease_pool;
        }

+       spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
+
+       /*
+        * Check for a node specific request.  Adjust global count, but
+        * restrict alloc/free to the specified node.
+        */
+       if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
+               unsigned long old_count = count;
+               count += h->nr_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid];
+               /*
+                * If user specified count causes overflow, set to
+                * largest possible value.
+                */
+               if (count < old_count)
+                       count = ULONG_MAX;
+       }
+
        /*
         * Increase the pool size
         * First take pages out of surplus state.  Then make up the
@@ -2300,7 +2317,6 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned
long count,
         * pool might be one hugepage larger than it needs to be, but
         * within all the constraints specified by the sysctls.
         */
-       spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
        while (h->surplus_huge_pages && count > persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
                if (!adjust_pool_surplus(h, nodes_allowed, -1))
                        break;
@@ -2421,16 +2437,18 @@ static ssize_t __nr_hugepages_store_common(bool
obey_mempolicy,
                        nodes_allowed = &node_states[N_MEMORY];
                }
        } else if (nodes_allowed) {
+               /* Node specific request */
+               init_nodemask_of_node(nodes_allowed, nid);
+       } else {
                /*
-                * per node hstate attribute: adjust count to global,
-                * but restrict alloc/free to the specified node.
+                * Node specific request, but we could not allocate
+                * node mask.  Pass in ALL nodes, and clear nid.
                 */
-               count += h->nr_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid];
-               init_nodemask_of_node(nodes_allowed, nid);
-       } else
+               nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
                nodes_allowed = &node_states[N_MEMORY];
+       }

-       err = set_max_huge_pages(h, count, nodes_allowed);
+       err = set_max_huge_pages(h, count, nid, nodes_allowed);
        if (err)
                goto out;

-- 
2.17.2

Reply via email to