On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Jing Xiangfeng wrote:

> On 2019/2/26 3:17, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > 
> >> Ok, what about just moving the calculation/check inside the lock as in the
> >> untested patch below?
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  mm/hugetlb.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> >> index 1c5219193b9e..5afa77dc7bc8 100644
> >> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> >> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> >> @@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ static int adjust_pool_surplus(struct hstate *h,
> >> nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  #define persistent_huge_pages(h) (h->nr_huge_pages - 
> >> h->surplus_huge_pages)
> >> -static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
> >> +static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int 
> >> nid,
> >>                                            nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
> >>  {
> >>    unsigned long min_count, ret;
> >> @@ -2289,6 +2289,23 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, 
> >> unsigned
> >> long count,
> >>            goto decrease_pool;
> >>    }
> >>
> >> +  spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> >> +
> >> +  /*
> >> +   * Check for a node specific request.  Adjust global count, but
> >> +   * restrict alloc/free to the specified node.
> >> +   */
> >> +  if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> >> +          unsigned long old_count = count;
> >> +          count += h->nr_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid];
> >> +          /*
> >> +           * If user specified count causes overflow, set to
> >> +           * largest possible value.
> >> +           */
> >> +          if (count < old_count)
> >> +                  count = ULONG_MAX;
> >> +  }
> >> +
> >>    /*
> >>     * Increase the pool size
> >>     * First take pages out of surplus state.  Then make up the
> >> @@ -2300,7 +2317,6 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, 
> >> unsigned
> >> long count,
> >>     * pool might be one hugepage larger than it needs to be, but
> >>     * within all the constraints specified by the sysctls.
> >>     */
> >> -  spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> >>    while (h->surplus_huge_pages && count > persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
> >>            if (!adjust_pool_surplus(h, nodes_allowed, -1))
> >>                    break;
> >> @@ -2421,16 +2437,18 @@ static ssize_t __nr_hugepages_store_common(bool
> >> obey_mempolicy,
> >>                    nodes_allowed = &node_states[N_MEMORY];
> >>            }
> >>    } else if (nodes_allowed) {
> >> +          /* Node specific request */
> >> +          init_nodemask_of_node(nodes_allowed, nid);
> >> +  } else {
> >>            /*
> >> -           * per node hstate attribute: adjust count to global,
> >> -           * but restrict alloc/free to the specified node.
> >> +           * Node specific request, but we could not allocate
> >> +           * node mask.  Pass in ALL nodes, and clear nid.
> >>             */
> >> -          count += h->nr_huge_pages - h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid];
> >> -          init_nodemask_of_node(nodes_allowed, nid);
> >> -  } else
> >> +          nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> >>            nodes_allowed = &node_states[N_MEMORY];
> >> +  }
> >>
> >> -  err = set_max_huge_pages(h, count, nodes_allowed);
> >> +  err = set_max_huge_pages(h, count, nid, nodes_allowed);
> >>    if (err)
> >>            goto out;
> >>
> > 
> > Looks good; Jing, could you test that this fixes your case?
> 
> Yes, I have tested this patch, it can also fix my case.

Great!

Reported-by: Jing Xiangfeng <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jing Xiangfeng <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]>

Reply via email to